Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Brandon Nakashima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Garcia-Lopez vs Nakashima analysis and find out who is favored!
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez vs Brandon Nakashima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Garcia-Lopez 1 - 0 Nakashima
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Garcia-Lopez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Nakashima has won 56.13%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Garcia-Lopez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nakashima has won 47.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 30.42% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Garcia-Lopez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nakashima has saved 67.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Garcia-Lopez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Nakashima winning 61.18% (W/L 52/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Garcia-Lopez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 271/ 210), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 41% (W/L 55/ 78). Nakashima has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 72% (W/L 54/ 21), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 52% (W/L 28/ 26).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Garcia-Lopez winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Garcia-Lopez winning 2 and Nakashima winning 0. The last match between Garcia-Lopez and Nakashima was at the Alicante Challenger, 12-10-2020, First, Clay with Guillermo Garcia-Lopez getting the victory 6-4 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:6.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Garcia-Lopez and Nakashima have played a deciding set 0 times, with Garcia-Lopez winning 0 times and Nakashima 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Garcia-Lopez winning 0, and Nakashima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Garcia-Lopez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Nakashima has played against players with an average rank of 231.91.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Garcia-Lopez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nakashima has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Garcia-Lopez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nakashima has converted 34.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
23
High
40
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
68
Rank
43
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
52% (528-493)
Career Total W/L
62% (192-120)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (34-14)
$3,856,006
Career Prize Money
$1,648,985
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Garcia-Lopez VS Nakashima H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:31:6 | 1:31:6 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (31/58) | 76% (45/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (24/31) | 60% (27/45) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 52% (14/27) | 50% (7/14) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (25/59) | 34% (20/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Garcia-Lopez VS Nakashima H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-3 |
Stats 
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Player
Brandon Nakashima
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Guillermo Garcia-Lopez | Brandon Nakashima |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (34/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 66% (71/37) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 54% (596/507) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (12/6) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/4) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.65 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 350 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.13 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 71 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:50:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 278.31 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 64% (2250/3490) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 75% (1679/2250) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 56% (696/1240) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 34% (103/300) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 37% (1343/3634) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 64% (7/4) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/2) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 77% (23/7) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (33/47) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 65% (17/26) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 64% (9/14) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 90% (31/28) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 10% (31/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 31% (16/5) |
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ulises Blanch
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
54%
(
45 of
84)
1st Serve %
60%
(
55 of
92)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
51%
(
20 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
27 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
95
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eduard Esteve Lobato
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
74%
(
46 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
54 of
90)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
45 of
90)
85
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
94%
(
30 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
35 of
63)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
6
92%
(
23 of
25)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
32 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pedro Martinez Portero
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
29 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
Player
Brandon Nakashima
53%
(
31 of
58)
1st Serve %
76%
(
45 of
59)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
5 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kimmer Coppejans
Player
Guillermo Garcia-Lopez
49%
(
48 of
97)
1st Serve %
54%
(
46 of
85)
3
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
49%
(
24 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
85)
92
Total Points Won
90
|
0-6 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R1 | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | |||
view more
Brandon Nakashima Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Francesco Passaro
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
63 of
108)
1st Serve %
63%
(
64 of
101)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
49 of
64)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
31%
(
33 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
34 of
101)
109
Total Points Won
100
|
7-6(2) 6-7(7) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mariano Navone
63%
(
62 of
99)
1st Serve %
70%
(
64 of
92)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
42 of
64)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
39 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
92)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 4-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Brandon Nakashima
57%
(
35 of
61)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
26%
(
16 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
21 of
61)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Jesper De Jong
49%
(
42 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
42 of
59)
70%
(
30 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
26 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
37 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Nerman Fatic
53%
(
39 of
74)
1st Serve %
65%
(
56 of
86)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
6
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
20 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
84
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Roman Safiullin
Player
Brandon Nakashima
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
46 of
77)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
77%
(
17 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
18 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Francisco Comesana
64%
(
65 of
101)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
82)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
41 of
57)
53%
(
19 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
37 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
28 of
82)
92
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Pedro Martinez Portero
56%
(
61 of
108)
1st Serve %
69%
(
68 of
99)
16
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
40 of
68)
38%
(
18 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
46%
(
50 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
48 of
99)
106
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Bagnis
Player
Brandon Nakashima
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
73%
(
58 of
80)
5
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
0
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
40 of
58)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
10%
(
1 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
17 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
28 of
80)
78
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Garcia-Lopez Vs Nakashima Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
